Comments on: Assembly generation failed Referenced assembly ‘xxx’ does not have a strong name http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/13/assembly-generation-failed-referenced-assembly-xxx-does-not-have-a-strong-name/ Wrecks of code floating in the sea of Internet By Ricci Gian Maria Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:15:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: alkampfer http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/13/assembly-generation-failed-referenced-assembly-xxx-does-not-have-a-strong-name/comment-page-1/#comment-3171 alkampfer Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:31:34 +0000 http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/13/assembly-generation-failed-referenced-assembly-xxx-does-not-have-a-strong-name/#comment-3171 You can put this into a simple batch file. alk. You can put this into a simple batch file.

alk.

]]> By: xusan http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/13/assembly-generation-failed-referenced-assembly-xxx-does-not-have-a-strong-name/comment-page-1/#comment-3166 xusan Tue, 22 Jun 2010 07:08:29 +0000 http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/13/assembly-generation-failed-referenced-assembly-xxx-does-not-have-a-strong-name/#comment-3166 i don't get to work this code please can u explaine where i should enter this thanks .. i don’t get to work this code please can u explaine where i should enter this
thanks ..

]]> By: FH http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/13/assembly-generation-failed-referenced-assembly-xxx-does-not-have-a-strong-name/comment-page-1/#comment-2911 FH Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:33:54 +0000 http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/13/assembly-generation-failed-referenced-assembly-xxx-does-not-have-a-strong-name/#comment-2911 Thanks for sharing this. It works great for my personal projects :) Thanks for sharing this. It works great for my personal projects :)

]]> By: alkampfer http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/13/assembly-generation-failed-referenced-assembly-xxx-does-not-have-a-strong-name/comment-page-1/#comment-2135 alkampfer Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:30:48 +0000 http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/13/assembly-generation-failed-referenced-assembly-xxx-does-not-have-a-strong-name/#comment-2135 Yes you are right, you always need to check the license to verify if this violate it. sorry for the captcas :P but it saves me from a lot of spam into comments, maybe in the future I'll try to remove it to check if akismeth is enough to avoid spamming thanks for the comment. alk. Yes you are right, you always need to check the license to verify if this violate it.
sorry for the captcas :P but it saves me from a lot of spam into comments, maybe in the future I’ll try to remove it to check if akismeth is enough to avoid spamming

thanks for the comment.

alk.

]]> By: OJ http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/13/assembly-generation-failed-referenced-assembly-xxx-does-not-have-a-strong-name/comment-page-1/#comment-2133 OJ Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:45:03 +0000 http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/13/assembly-generation-failed-referenced-assembly-xxx-does-not-have-a-strong-name/#comment-2133 This might be a catch-all solution but it's not always safe. You may be in violation of EULA/Licence Agreements. At the same time, you're signing someone else's binary and hence saying that you're vouching for it. If it stuffs up or causes an issue with a client's machine, then you're the one responsible. Just be careful. PS. captchas suck :-) This might be a catch-all solution but it’s not always safe. You may be in violation of EULA/Licence Agreements. At the same time, you’re signing someone else’s binary and hence saying that you’re vouching for it. If it stuffs up or causes an issue with a client’s machine, then you’re the one responsible.

Just be careful.

PS. captchas suck :-)

]]>