<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disappointed about diskeeper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/</link>
	<description>Wrecks of code floating in the sea of Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 12:34:55 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Folland</title>
		<link>http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/comment-page-1/#comment-3067</link>
		<dc:creator>Folland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 23:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/#comment-3067</guid>
		<description>Fantastic post, can I link to this from my blog?

thanks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic post, can I link to this from my blog?</p>
<p>thanks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alkampfer</title>
		<link>http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/comment-page-1/#comment-2675</link>
		<dc:creator>alkampfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/#comment-2675</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve rebuild the drive, but the system won&#039;t boot, then recover the system and everything was ok.

Now I use a single 10k disk for my principal system, and a RAID0 with two 10k disk for secondary disk. I use Windows7 and it defrag both volumes at scheduled time, never had a problem in a couple of week.

I installed Diskeeper in my laptop, since I own a valid license and it goes very well.

Alk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve rebuild the drive, but the system won&#8217;t boot, then recover the system and everything was ok.</p>
<p>Now I use a single 10k disk for my principal system, and a RAID0 with two 10k disk for secondary disk. I use Windows7 and it defrag both volumes at scheduled time, never had a problem in a couple of week.</p>
<p>I installed Diskeeper in my laptop, since I own a valid license and it goes very well.</p>
<p>Alk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/comment-page-1/#comment-2674</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/#comment-2674</guid>
		<description>alkampfer,  i had a similar experience.  And until i started reading some posts on RAID failures from using Diskeeper, i was thinking that it was just a coincidence.

did you replace the degraded hd? or did you just rebuild your RAID and go on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alkampfer,  i had a similar experience.  And until i started reading some posts on RAID failures from using Diskeeper, i was thinking that it was just a coincidence.</p>
<p>did you replace the degraded hd? or did you just rebuild your RAID and go on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruchi</title>
		<link>http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/comment-page-1/#comment-2506</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/#comment-2506</guid>
		<description>Diskeeper Corporation has created a vital component previously missing from virtualized environment productivity. V-locity with InvisiTasking® installs on both the Windows Server® 2008 OS that is running the virtual host and all Windows® virtual machines (guests). Each component optimizes its respective Windows OS and performs defragmentation of files and consolidation of free space. This minimizes unnecessary I/O passed from the OS to the disk subsystem and aligns data on the drives for optimal access.

With the proprietary InvisiTasking, V-locity will automatically and invisibly defragment files and consolidate free space on every Windows system it is installed, eliminating unnecessary and excess I/O to restore system performance and reliability for the entire platform. At the same time, V-locity provides a tool to analyze and compact wasted virtual disk space. 

For additional information, contact V-locity@diskeeper.com.

www.diskeeper.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diskeeper Corporation has created a vital component previously missing from virtualized environment productivity. V-locity with InvisiTasking® installs on both the Windows Server® 2008 OS that is running the virtual host and all Windows® virtual machines (guests). Each component optimizes its respective Windows OS and performs defragmentation of files and consolidation of free space. This minimizes unnecessary I/O passed from the OS to the disk subsystem and aligns data on the drives for optimal access.</p>
<p>With the proprietary InvisiTasking, V-locity will automatically and invisibly defragment files and consolidate free space on every Windows system it is installed, eliminating unnecessary and excess I/O to restore system performance and reliability for the entire platform. At the same time, V-locity provides a tool to analyze and compact wasted virtual disk space. </p>
<p>For additional information, contact <a href="mailto:V-locity@diskeeper.com">V-locity@diskeeper.com</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.diskeeper.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.diskeeper.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alkampfer</title>
		<link>http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/comment-page-1/#comment-2097</link>
		<dc:creator>alkampfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/#comment-2097</guid>
		<description>The bad thing is that the disk was ok before running diskeeper, after rebuilding the array everything went ok again.

alk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bad thing is that the disk was ok before running diskeeper, after rebuilding the array everything went ok again.</p>
<p>alk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/comment-page-1/#comment-2095</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/#comment-2095</guid>
		<description>It is more likely that the failing disk in your RAID array caused your system slowness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is more likely that the failing disk in your RAID array caused your system slowness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alkampfer</title>
		<link>http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/comment-page-1/#comment-2039</link>
		<dc:creator>alkampfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/#comment-2039</guid>
		<description>You are right, I used perfect disk in the past and it was really great, I think I&#039;ll move again to Perfect Disk in the near future.

alk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right, I used perfect disk in the past and it was really great, I think I&#8217;ll move again to Perfect Disk in the near future.</p>
<p>alk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Abusamra</title>
		<link>http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/comment-page-1/#comment-2038</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Abusamra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/disappointed-about-diskeeper/#comment-2038</guid>
		<description>An alternative you might want to look at is PerfectDisk, which provides     scheduling (as well as continuous defrag), which many find useful in  virtual environment to avoid resource contention. PerfectDisk also completely consolidates free space. 

And there is even a PerfectDisk for VMware, which handles both the guests and host, and also automates the VMware Shrink utility to recapture space.

Joe Abusamra
www.perfectdisk,com
www,perfectdiskblog.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An alternative you might want to look at is PerfectDisk, which provides     scheduling (as well as continuous defrag), which many find useful in  virtual environment to avoid resource contention. PerfectDisk also completely consolidates free space. </p>
<p>And there is even a PerfectDisk for VMware, which handles both the guests and host, and also automates the VMware Shrink utility to recapture space.</p>
<p>Joe Abusamra<br />
<a href="http://www.perfectdisk,com" rel="nofollow">http://www.perfectdisk,com</a><br />
www,perfectdiskblog.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
