Comments on: LINQ ForEach for IEnumerable<T> http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2008/08/13/linq-foreach-for-ienumerablet/ Wrecks of code floating in the sea of Internet By Ricci Gian Maria Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:15:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: alkampfer http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2008/08/13/linq-foreach-for-ienumerablet/comment-page-1/#comment-2487 alkampfer Thu, 28 May 2009 07:33:32 +0000 http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2008/08/13/linq-foreach-for-ienumerablet/#comment-2487 Yes, you are right. Quite always there are reason for everything, I must admit that the reason you point up in the link is really reasonable. Sith a similar ForEach we have a LINQ operator with side effect, and this can violate the principle of least surprise. Thanks for the link. Alk. Yes, you are right. Quite always there are reason for everything, I must admit that the reason you point up in the link is really reasonable. Sith a similar ForEach we have a LINQ operator with side effect, and this can violate the principle of least surprise.

Thanks for the link.

Alk.

]]> By: Chuck Wagner http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2008/08/13/linq-foreach-for-ienumerablet/comment-page-1/#comment-2484 Chuck Wagner Wed, 27 May 2009 23:10:46 +0000 http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2008/08/13/linq-foreach-for-ienumerablet/#comment-2484 Alk, I think there is a reason Linq leaves this method out of the framework. Checkout John Skeet's comments on the subject, http://stackoverflow.com/questions/200574/linq-equivalent-of-foreach-for-ienumerable . Alk,

I think there is a reason Linq leaves this method out of the framework. Checkout John Skeet’s comments on the subject, http://stackoverflow.com/quest.....enumerable .

]]> By: lomaxx http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2008/08/13/linq-foreach-for-ienumerablet/comment-page-1/#comment-1968 lomaxx Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:58:43 +0000 http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2008/08/13/linq-foreach-for-ienumerablet/#comment-1968 really nice elegant solution. Thanks really nice elegant solution. Thanks

]]>