Comments on: Linq to Sql,working with detached object ……..

By: electrical wiring

electrical wiring — Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:52:00 +0000

Wow! gracias! i always wanted to write in my site something like that. Can i take part of your post to my blog?
Cu Soon

By: Dave

Dave — Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:36:56 +0000

your edit with the Refresh() suggestion worked perfectly, thank you. I had tried using the true and TEntity parameters to Attach() without success.

By: Jonny C

Jonny C — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:30:54 +0000

Dude! I had just finished an ugly old Manual merge method when I found the edit. It worked a treat.

Many Thanks!

By: Adereeprexiny

Adereeprexiny — Wed, 07 May 2008 17:48:30 +0000

Retirement means that when someone says “Have a nice day”, you
actually have a shot at it.

—————————————————————————————————-
http://rodneyharrisbi.easyjournal.com

By: Steve B

Steve B — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:57:45 +0000

I found a solution that didn’t require writing any extra methods. It may be helpful to others. You can find it here. http://forums.microsoft.com/ms.....8;siteid=1

By: alkampfer

alkampfer — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 06:25:14 +0000

Yep, It turns out that creating a manual Merge method could maybe represent the best solution.

alk.

By: Roman

Roman — Sun, 16 Mar 2008 10:47:35 +0000

Using Refresh could be a pretty good way as a workaround for this ‘feature’ but remeber that refresh only refreshes specified object – not it’s hierarchy (i.e. customer orders could also have been modified during detachment – unfortunately it seems additional code is required to handle such case)