Comments on: Again on Castle Transient and the Custom lifecycle http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2008/02/29/again-on-castle-transient-and-the-custom-lifecycle/ Wrecks of code floating in the sea of Internet By Ricci Gian Maria Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:15:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: Castle Windsor: Transient Objects and Release Policies at Guardian's Home http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2008/02/29/again-on-castle-transient-and-the-custom-lifecycle/comment-page-1/#comment-2724 Castle Windsor: Transient Objects and Release Policies at Guardian's Home Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:43:46 +0000 http://www.nablasoft.com/Alkampfer/?p=156#comment-2724 [...] http://www.nablasoft.com/alkampfer/index.php/2008/02/29/again-on-castle-transient-and-the-custom-lif... [...] [...] http://www.nablasoft.com/alkam.....stom-lif... [...]

]]> By: Alkampfer’s Place » Blog Archives » Again and again on Castle and lifecycle. http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2008/02/29/again-on-castle-transient-and-the-custom-lifecycle/comment-page-1/#comment-76 Alkampfer’s Place » Blog Archives » Again and again on Castle and lifecycle. Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:53:32 +0000 http://www.nablasoft.com/Alkampfer/?p=156#comment-76 [...] to a  context. This lifecycle was created to address the problem of disposing inner object, you can find the deails here. This new version support both singleton and transient objects, this a sample [...] [...] to a  context. This lifecycle was created to address the problem of disposing inner object, you can find the deails here. This new version support both singleton and transient objects, this a sample [...]

]]> By: alkampfer http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2008/02/29/again-on-castle-transient-and-the-custom-lifecycle/comment-page-1/#comment-70 alkampfer Sun, 02 Mar 2008 07:57:32 +0000 http://www.nablasoft.com/Alkampfer/?p=156#comment-70 Yep, my implementation is a very "First thing I have in mind" I already set up a little project and modified a little bit the lifecycle, in the next days I'll try to address your issue. Actually my custom lifecycle works well only if all the dependencies are made between object sharing the same lifecycle. Alk. Yep, my implementation is a very “First thing I have in mind” I already set up a little project and modified a little bit the lifecycle, in the next days I’ll try to address your issue.

Actually my custom lifecycle works well only if all the dependencies are made between object sharing the same lifecycle.

Alk.

]]> By: Nick http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2008/02/29/again-on-castle-transient-and-the-custom-lifecycle/comment-page-1/#comment-69 Nick Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:06:46 +0000 http://www.nablasoft.com/Alkampfer/?p=156#comment-69 Hi Alk, That is a really clever idea :) I can't remember how much creation context you can get hold of in MicroKernel (I know Ninject provides the requesting type, but uses a different model..) - you might want to add a test to make sure that your custom instance isn't satisfying the dependencies of an instance with a life cycle that extends beyond the immediate context, e.g. is a singleton. If a singleton required an instance of 'DisposableCon' and was initialised during the context, it would be left attached to a disposed instance when the context ended. Enjoying your articles, keep it up! Regards, Nick Hi Alk,

That is a really clever idea :)

I can’t remember how much creation context you can get hold of in MicroKernel (I know Ninject provides the requesting type, but uses a different model..) – you might want to add a test to make sure that your custom instance isn’t satisfying the dependencies of an instance with a life cycle that extends beyond the immediate context, e.g. is a singleton.

If a singleton required an instance of ‘DisposableCon’ and was initialised during the context, it would be left attached to a disposed instance when the context ended.

Enjoying your articles, keep it up!

Regards,

Nick

]]>